Tank Museum Photo Gallery

Here is a link to a nice photo gallery of some of the tanks on display at the Tank Museum at Bovington in the UK.  This gallery belongs to flickr user “Arekev.”

Click on the image to go to the flickr page.

tank museum gallery

 

From the Vault: WW2 US Armor Force Pictures

Here is a photo gallery of images taken from the book “He’s in the Armored Force Now.”  This book was published in 1942 and was written by Captain Addison R. McGhee Jr., and it follows the experiences of some typical trainees in the US armored force in the early part of WW2.  This book is long out of print, having been published in 1942.  Those looking for photos of early war US tanks such as the M2 light or M3 medium will find these pictures of interest.  The photos are posted in slideshow format below.

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Here are the photos in regular gallery format.

From the Vault: Ogorkiewicz on Swiss tanks

From the Jan-Feb 1967 issue of ARMOR is this article on Swiss armor by British tank expert Richard Ogorkiewicz.  A good deal of the article focuses on the Swiss Pz.61, a vehicle that was relatively new when the article was published.

 

From the Vault: British WW2 tank gun effectiveness report

Here is a short report that was found by a friend of the site while archive digging on “Estimation of the Chances of Defeating Enemy A.F.Vs. with British Tank and Anti-Tank Guns” created by Armor Operation Research Group.  No date is included in the report, but it is reasonable to assume it was written during the latter part of WW2.  This report was photographed quickly by hand, so please excuse the quality of the pictures.  It is probably best not to take the figures provided in this report as gospel since the report clearly states that it is providing estimates, not test results.  To quote the report itself:

The estimates have little meaning as isolated absolute values and are to be interpreted on a comparative basis only.  Even with this proviso they are not fully reliable owing to paucity of information regarding such subjects as German armour performance and behavior of capped shot at high angles of attack.  It is pointed out in particular that the estimates probably tend to overvalue gun performances at longer ranges, owing to the method us for assessing accuracy of fire, and that they are not sufficiently reliable for fine comparisons to be drawn between performances of A.P. and A.P.C.B.C. shot of the same calibre.

That said, the report is interesting as it shows what the British Army assumed was the effectiveness of their tank and anti-tank weapons versus late war German armor.

From the Vault: British Motion Studies on German Tanks

20131231_092550Today we present a British study from December of 1947 on ‘Motion Studies of German Tanks.”  This report examines the ergonomics of late WW2 German tanks Tiger, Tiger II an Panther.  The report focuses on crew comfort and efficiency, looking at each crew position and providing analysis.  Detailed charts of gun loading times are included in the report, as are diagrams of the ammo storage layout.  This report was photographed at a archive by a friend of the site.  We have put the report into a PDF and posted it on Internet Archive.  The quality of the photos varies, although the report is legible.  Due to the way it was photographed, many of the pages are at a bit of an angle.

Download the report here.

From the Vault: The Interphone System in Armored Vehicles

Today we present an article from the July-Aug 1946 issue of ARMOR titles “The Interphone System for Armored Vehicles” by Lt. John Heran.  This piece explains the operation of the interphone system in US WW2 era tanks.  It includes a list of terms used by tankers of the period.

From the Vault: Tank Armament

Today we present a two page article from the Nov-Dec 1946 issue of ARMOR written by the School of Tank Technology.  This piece describes some of the technical considerations regarding tank gun design in the immediate post war period.  In particular, the article discusses issues relating to mounting the gun in a tank turret and the role of recoil systems and muzzle breaks.

From the Vault: Road Test the M48

Today we present a rather humorous piece from the Jan-Feb 1967 issue of ARMOR title “Road Test the M48” by Ron Klein and Eric Erickson.  This piece takes a look at the US M48 in the style of an automotive magazine road test style article.  We have provided a transcription of the article, along with scans of the original.

header

After years of testing sports cars, sedans, personal cars, racing cars, limousines, station wagons, phaetons, broughams, classics, convertibles, both foreign and domestic, we believe we have found the ultimate mode of travel for the all-around, all-American sportsman who has a highly refined taste for powerful and truly distinctive transportation and no qualms about paying for it. This exceptional vehicle is the M-48 Town and Country Sports Saloon. Conservative in design and functional in appointments, the M-48 possesses a classic elegance. As with other vehicles there have been design changes over the years; today’s M-48 is lower and longer than its 1920 counterpart and performance is up, but its basic utilitarian configuration is virtually unchanged.

As we examined this model closely on the show-room floor, we noticed a few disadvantages to this particular body style. The engine components are not readily accessible. and the four cupola-type entrances require some healthy gymnastics to negotiate. In keeping with its basic conservatism, the exterior shows little embellishment. In fact, the manufacturer provides a rather unimaginative color scheme: everything is painted olive green. Custom paint jobs are available on special request, but these are limited to polar white and two-tone jungle green.

The only possible description 01 tne interior design is functional. There are two types of seats in the M-48. The driver is provided a deep, comfortable bucket seat (bottom only) similar to those found on early vintage farm tractors. The passengers have somewhat more austere accommodations: a seat similar to a small, flat bar stool. We have found that this stool is capable of supporting approximately one-half of the average derriere at a time making it necessary to alternate rather frequently. The absence of ashtrays and a glove compartment further demonstrates the parsimonious attitude of the designer when it comes to providing the niceties of passenger comfort. Curious cylindrical tubes and sheet metal boxes serve as footrests and backrests if semi-reclining positions are desired. Roof insulation and upholstery were of fine quality steel plating several inches in thickness.

Luggage space is plentiful if one happens to own distinctive luggage. There is no trunk per se, but there are four score or more tubular containers about two feet long and four inches in diameter which are handy for storage. Elsewhere throughout the interior one can find places for suitcases of various sizes although loading and unloading is rather awkward since everything must go in through the sun roof, or hatch, as it is called in this model.

We tested the riding qualities of the M-48 on various road surfaces, and noted a minimum of squeaks and rattles. This is obviously due to the vehicle’s solid construction and the fact that the manufacturer has been free with sound-deadening materials, such as six-inch steel plate. The suspension system, consisting of 12 torsion bars and shock absorbers, merits the highest praise. The resulting ride is not unlike that in an overstuffed rocking chair. On a cross-town run, sidewalk curbs, traffic islands, and an itinerant Volkswagen or two passed virtually unnoticed under the massive treads of the M-48. We can state without qualification that this vehicle has no equal on or off the road today when it comes to riding qualities. Further, traction and control are not a problem on rough roads. It is felt that the weight (50 tons) of the M-48 goes a long way in providing a positive relationship between the ground and the treads.

pic 1The model we tested was equipped with power steering, a feature that should be a must on every buyer’s list of options. Turning was effortless, and from lock to lock the steering wheel required only 1/2 turn. The M-48 comers with extreme agility, and there was literally no lean or sway. The only drawback in cornering at high speeds was a ten- dencv to plow rather deep furrows in the asphalt paving. Because of this we hope that the public- spirited individual who is fortunate enough to own this machine will limit his hot-rodding to unimproved roads or the dirt track. Another highly desirable maneuvering characteristic of the M-48 is its neutral steer capability. That is, while the vehicle is stationary and the transmission is in neutral, the M-48 can be made to turn within its own length by turning the steering wheel either right or left and depressing the accelerator. This maneuver is very effective for parking but has an unfortunate tendency to level anything alongside, such as parking meters and telephone poles.

The noise level inside the M-48 was high, as we had anticipated, and of course the single-cast steel hull produced considerable resonance. But then the M-48 has never claimed to be a car in which the loudest noise is the ticking of the clock.

With the driver’s hatch, or sun-roof, open, the driver has truly amazing forward visibility; he is provided with a 180 degree panorama without as much as a windshield to obstruct the view. Since the driver’s seat is located in the center of the vehicle, maneuvering through heavy traffic becomes child’s play. Rearward visibility, on the other hand, is not so good, as the passenger compartment limits all aft vision, and no rear-view mirror is present. However, the average driver will not find this to be a particular disadvantage. He would soon adopt a completely indifferent attitude with respect to what is behind him, realizing that it makes very little difference in the end.

We felt that the two-speed automatic transmission offered on this model was more appropriate for ladies’ day at the supermarket than for rugged town and country driving. A four-speed box would be more to our liking and offer the kind of performance a man would expect from this type of machine. We found it impossible to break the track loose while digging out from a standing start. However, on one occasion we were able to detect slippage while accelerating from a standing position, and that was in trying to pick up speed for an up-hill climb from a bridge crossing. Even then the tracks did not lose their grip; the bridge was pulled from its supports.

The M-48 is powered by a Continental V-12 air- cooled engine of about 825 horsepower. The cylinders are individually replaceable units. Overhead valves with rocker arm assemblies are actuated by a camshaft along each bank. Two mechanical fans provide cooling air around cylinders and oil coolers. Power is transmitted to the final drives through a cross-drive transmission, which is a combined transmission, steering, and braking unit. The brakes are of the wet, multiple disk type.

The engine lies beneath a six-foot square grating which makes up part of the rear deck. Care must be taken in walking on this deck while the engine is running, since during rapid deceleration, three or four-foot sheets of flame sometimes sweep across the deck from the exhaust which is located just behind the passenger compartment.

This model may present some maintenance problems to the do-it-yourself enthusiast. Although major assemblies such as engine and transmission can be uncoupled and removed in an amazingly short time, one may have some difficulty in accomplishing their actual removal. For the engine, a hoist of at least 8000 pounds capacity is desired. The transmission is comparatively light, equal to the curb weight of a couple of Volkswagens, at most.

Fuel consumption in the M-48 is, as we expected, high-approximately one-third of a mile to the gallon under ordinary driving conditions. Also, general preventive maintenance is somewhat more expensive than average; an oil change in both the engine and transmission runs about a hundred dollars. But the M-48 is not, after all, designed for the man who was to watch his pennies.

pic 2Finally, we cannot ignore the fact that the M-48 is made to order for the sportsman. This is one of the very few Detroit production models that comes equipped with a built-in big-game rifle. Whether hunting moose in British Columbia or rhinos in Africa, the sporting enthusiast has at his fingertips at all times the wherewithal to keep the family larder stocked with delicacies. Furthermore, Detroit could take a major step forward in solving the problem of congested highways by making this standard equipment on all production models.

Allow us to re-emphasize the fact that the M-48 is not the vehicle for everyone. The mother with young children will find its indestructability praise-worthy, but she will also find that disembarking presents an embarrassing problem, especially while wearing a tight skirt. The young man whose goal is security and social status will hardly find this vehicle conducive to his best interests career-wise, social-wise, and girl-wise.

But for the all-around hearty male type who can afford it-for the man who lets nothing stand in his way-the man with outdoor interests and lots of enemies-we say this is IT!

From the Vault: Motorized Combat Transport (1921)

ordnance May Jun 1921 motorized transport croppedToday we dive back into the May-June 1921 issue of Ordnance Journal to showcase an article on “Motorized Transport.”  Written by Colonel Lucien Moody, this piece looks at one of the earliest attempts by the US Army to develop a tracked troop and supply transport vehicle.  Oddly, the article contains several pictures of a small, square shaped tracked vehicle being put through a series of tests but does not provide a description of this particular vehicle in the body of the text.

Click on the individual images below to view the article page.

 

From the Vault: MBT Steering and Transmissions circa 1972

In the second of our transmission themed “From the Vault” posts today, we present a 1972 article from International Defense Review titled “The Modern Battle Tank: Steering and Transmissions.”  Contrasting this article with the previous post from 1921 should give the reader a pretty good idea of just how far AFV transmissions advanced in 50 years.

Click on the thumbnails below to view the article image full size.